◦ ARCHIVE INDEX — browse every page
Red's Army

Report: Celtics most likely destination if Westbrook gets traded

westbrook boston

When Kevin Durant walked away from Oklahoma City, most NBA followers had the same logical reaction…

Russell Westbrook is going to get traded!

There is zero chance that Sam Presti lets his two biggest stars walk away for nothing. I can understand going to the hilt on Durant and hoping you can sell him on family and finishing what they started. He couldn’t, and now there’s a very real worry in a very small market that they’ll have a very long rebuild on their hands.

It is with this backdrop that Howard Beck goes on a speculative run down the rabbit hole and suggests that there is a feeling among NBA General Managers that Westbrook will indeed start the season in another city, and that city is very likely going to be Boston.

Here’s the video.

If for some reason it doesn’t play, here’s the direct link to Bleacher Report.

Yes, this is a heavily couched feeling that follows logical steps and general sentiment… so it’s important to note that there is no report of actual talks. However, unlike other recent rumors, Howard Beck is a very respected national writer with a sterling reputation and actual sources… not some random radio station employee or blogger. Beck is actually speaking to General Managers and is gauging the sentiment himself.

So while there is no smoke or fire to speak of yet, there are matches, sticks, and some kindling here and a couple of guys who know how to build a fire nearby. The Celtics have any number of assets they can move in a trade like this, including two of the best draft picks any team will find over the next couple of years and some solid young players to help push that rebuild forward pretty quickly.

If Sam Presti is truly going to hit that reset button, the Celtics will have what he wants. If they can get Westbrook and pair him with Horford AND have money to get ANOTHER max guy next year?

Well… now we’re cookin’

Like this Article? Share it!

  • Kevin

    Well, it’s obvious that Celtics have the most assets to trade so it would make sense. But, why do it if you’re the Cs? He’ll still be a free agent next year if he doesn’t sign an extension. You’re in the same boat the Thunder are in. There’s also a high chance that he bolts the Celtics for the Lakers next year. He’s a CA guy, and given his off the court thriving fashion business, Hollywood would make the most sense for him. Love him as a player, but not sure if he’s worth the risk.

  • adam

    I’m down for a trade if it doesn’t hurt the core to much. I’d be willing to lose smart, rozier, Hunter, young (not all, maybe 2 max) and maybe some later first round picks. That’s about it for a rental. I don’t even feel good about giving away smart or rozier on a 1 year rental. Shoot to me it’s only worth draft picks for a1 year. Throw in some of our guys from 2nd round and young.

    • jq0216

      agreed, unless we get the firm commitment to resign, which i doubt we will.

    • adam

      yeah IT would probably have to go, but he is the guy that got Horford here. he’s the glue I think on this team. Or one part of the glue.

  • art

    Westbrook would have to sign an extension to stay in Boston beyond one year. Otherwise, no way Jose.

  • Adam Stark

    It all dependes on if he signs an extension. If not then no, I wouldn’t even trade Amir for him. But if we can have him for at least the next 4-5 seasons then maybe a package of 2018 nets pick, Rozier, Bradley, Jarebko (to make contracts work) and James Young. Move Thomas to the bench and Smart into the starting 2 spot. I know people will say that’s not enough to get Westbrook but it’s better than just letting him walk.

    • Curt Hays

      Do not bench Thomas. Might as well trade him if you’re going to bench him.

      • Adam Stark

        But the C’s probably won’t get a huge amount back. I’d rather him come in as a 6th man. He is Mr Celtic.

    • RedHead617

      “If not then no, I wouldn’t even trade Amir for him.” I’d just like to acknowledge this as the dumbest statement any RedsArmy board has ever seen. Also, lowballing the Thunder would work if we were the only other trade partner in the league, but there are 28 others who’d probably like to have Westbrook and would likely pay more than Amir Johnson to get him, even with the possibility he leaves next summer.
      And let’s also acknowledge that Westbrook would be a fool to sign an extension before free agency. And the Thunder would be foolish to keep him. So really, this entire conversation relates to the value of one Westbrook season and the increased chance that having him for one year will entice him to re-sign.

  • TMC

    How about this (contingent on extension from Russ)

    Thunder get:
    -Smart
    -Johnson
    -Rozier
    -Choice of 1 BKN pick (prob 2017 because they will want to accelerate the rebuild)
    -2 non BKN first rounders

    Celts get:
    -Russ
    -Steven Adams

    It’s a heavy price tag compared to other ones mentioned here, but we can’t expect to send scrap parts and expect to get an all-NBA caliber player.

    • Curt Hays

      I was all against this until I saw Adams. Still too heavy of a price. For a one year rental, they can’t expect that much.

      • TMC

        like I said, this deal is contingent on Russ signing an extension

      • TMC

        As much as we may like these guys, we’re getting to the point where we have too many quality players on the roster. If we keep hanging onto players, there isn’t going to be enough minutes to go around. With this, we do get a little bit of “addition by subtraction” by exchanging two guards that will likely take minutes for one.

        • Curt Hays

          I’m with you, but it’s not because I want to hold onto guys. trading all those players for the two we’d be getting would be a nice deal. Thing is, you don’t know that Russ will sign an extension, even if he says he will. I would offer those three players and one pick, at the most.

          • TMC

            Well, it would also put us in the drivers seat to give him the best offer come free agency time. Owning his rights when he becomes a free agent means we can go over the cap to sign him and be the only team that can offer a 5th year.

            With next years cap looking to be $102 mil, that’s $30 mill starting and would likely be a 5 year contract in the $160-175 million range. That final year at near $40 mil will be awfully hard to turn down to go somewhere else.

  • CF

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but if we were able to resign Westbrook(a HUGE if) wouldn’t that take away the ability to sign another max deal?

    • Astarot

      I think It would as Cs already have Horford on a max deal. They could potentially have over 30m in cap space next year depend on what salary cap would eventually be but still that would only give them space for one more max player. I thought they could work that out to get two more max players next off season but I don’t think that’s possible under any circumstances.

    • TMC

      depends on the timing. If we acquire him by trade, then we will get his bird rights and then can go over the cap to sign him. That way, you can go out and get another high price contract in free agency, then once the ink is dry sign Westbrook while going over the cap.

      This would involve a wink, wink with Russ and his agent, though.

      • CF

        I totally forgot about the Bird rights… Thank you!

  • Curt Hays

    What better way to teach KD a lesson than to beat him in the Finals with Westbrook?

  • Michael Merriam

    If we trade Smart and Johnson for Westbrook, then still have flexibility to sign Hayward, I’m fine giving up a Nets pick. Yes of course contingent upon a handshake reup agreement.

    I’m not in favor of including Rozier or Bradley. If they want Hunter or Young? no problem mon!

  • RedHead617

    Either we deal the 2017 Nets pick or Jaylen Brown in any deal. It’s the sad reality of the cost for Westbrook. Much as I like Jaylen’s potential, that Nets pick is looking like an easy Top 5 selection in a draft that is said to be both deep and excellent. Like Marcus Smart, Jaylen Brown is raw and can’t shoot; combine them with Amir Johnson, give IT 26 minutes a game off the bench, and don’t look back.

  • Amir Buxbaum

    Anyone else has a problem seeing Westbrook playing alongside IT?

    • Jester00

      IT will most like go in the the trade, but no I don’t Westbrook is a top 5 player in the NBA he played with weird beard and he is a knucklehead

  • romeo0119

    Only makes sense if we only have to give up one of the Brooklyn pick, without giving up Bradly or Rozier, any of the rookie can go, but only if Westbrook sign a long term deal. Don’t give up nothing, and I repeat nathan if no long term deal.

  • zippittyay

    I’m just not chompin at the bit to root for Russell Westbrook.

  • Lee in Oregon

    There’s nobody on the roster (or any pick) I wouldn’t give up to get Westbrook. As long as he’s down with re-upping in Boston, this would be incredible. The guy is a stud, every night of the season. I can’t believe some of you aren’t down with this, he’s only the best point guard in the NBA who goes hard on both ends and hates to lose. Go Danny!

  • wendytindys8555